A new study shows that a car that is not equipped with electronic stability control (ESC) may be in the process of failing, and it may not have been properly repaired.
The study by the University of California, Irvine, is based on a study conducted by Dr. James S. O’Keefe and his colleagues at the University at Buffalo.
The researchers concluded that “ESC systems that are capable of detecting defects in the driver’s system and failing to correct the problem in the event of an accident should be incorporated into a range of vehicles and should be made available to drivers with disabilities.”
The study was published in the American Journal of Automotive Repair.
In a press release, O’Malley said the study demonstrated that “the issue is not only about electronic stability controls, it is about the underlying cause of an automobile’s mechanical failures, and the potential for them to be caused by other mechanical failures in the system, or defects in components that are not fully tested.”
“While this study is limited in that it does not specifically address the causes of failures in electronic stability systems, it does suggest that a broader range of failures may occur with electronic systems that have failed to properly test and diagnose the vehicle’s mechanical systems,” O’Reilly said.
“This is an important step in the research process to understand the root causes of these failures and provide solutions to prevent them from happening in the future,” he said.
The researchers conducted a systematic review of the safety records of over 9,000 vehicles and vehicles that were tested over the past 40 years and determined that of the vehicles that had failed to meet safety requirements, “approximately 10% were not properly tested, repaired, or replaced.”
“Although we have made some progress in identifying and addressing the root cause of the failure, there are other factors at play that may contribute to the failure,” O’thar wrote.
“It is critical that we find a comprehensive solution to these problems so that we can provide safe driving environments to all.”
O’Reilly explained that the study looked at the types of systems that were used on the roads in the United States in the 1990s and early 2000s.
“The vehicle that was studied was a 1990s-era Nissan Altima,” he noted.
“A recent study by one of our partners has also found that some of the same issues that may have been associated with the Altima’s mechanical failure may have occurred in the Altimas that were in the same vehicle model and age range as the Altis studied.”
The researchers also looked at data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to see how long the vehicle had been out of service before it failed.
They found that it was in the first quarter of 2020.
O’Keefe said that he and his team found that the NHTSA data indicates that at least half of the time, the problem is not related to the vehicle.
“When a vehicle is out of warranty, that is, the vehicle has been in service for at least 30 days, and its owner is not present when the vehicle is repaired, it will not have a mechanical failure,” he wrote.
“In some instances, the owner may have to return the vehicle to the dealer and re-repair the vehicle, which may take some time.”
O’Keefe said that his team will continue to investigate the problem.
The study is an example of how automakers are taking proactive steps to improve the quality of their vehicles, he said, noting that the automakers are working to improve their vehicle maintenance and repair programs.
“We are hoping that this will be an opportunity for the industry to improve, to address the root problems and to take more proactive steps,” O’dhar said.
O’Keeffe also stressed that the research did not take into account the risk factors that could have led to the car’s failure.
“Our analysis was not about the likelihood of a particular failure in a particular vehicle.
We did not look at any other factors that might have caused the failure in the vehicle,” he added.